The Return of a 1950s Pathology

“Before [the 1950s], homosexuality was understood and articulated through the lens of hetereonormativity. The assumption was that desire itself was heterosexual.

This assumption made it inconceivable that males might desire other males as males, or that females might desire other females as females. Instead, clinicians insisted that males who desired other males possessed a female subjectivity, and that women who desired women were psychologically male (hence the [pathologized] term ‘invert’, which was widely used in medical and popular contexts to designate homosexuals).”

Deb Cameron and Don Kulick, Language and Sexuality

Emphasis mine.

Advertisements

One thought on “The Return of a 1950s Pathology

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s